AI& DECISION LOG

This document records the decisions, revisions, open questions, and next steps resulting from the presentation and discussion session for AI&.

Post Presentation & Discussion Record

Version 0.1

• March 2026

---

1. Meeting Information

Project: AI& Session Type: Presentation and Discussion Date: [Insert Date] Time: [Insert Time] Location / Platform: [Insert Location or Meeting Platform] Facilitator: [Insert Name] Note Taker: [Insert Name]

Participants:

• [Name / Role]

• [Name / Role]

• [Name / Role]

---

2. Purpose of This Log

This document records the decisions, revisions, open questions, and next steps resulting from the presentation and discussion session for AI&.

Its purpose is to ensure that the team does not rely on memory alone, and that all important agreements are visible before moving into the next phase.

---

3. Documents Reviewed in the Session

Mark the documents reviewed:

• Document 1 – Revised Presentation Narrative

• Document 2 – Strategic Notes and References

• Document 3 – Product Blueprint

• Document 4 – Pilot Protocol

• Other: [Insert if any]

---

4. Summary of Overall Response

General Response from Participants

[Write a short summary of how the participants responded overall.]

Example:

• Strong interest in the physician-controlled assistant concept

• Agreement on starting with documentation support

• Concern about privacy and workflow fit

• Request for clearer pilot boundaries

---

5. Decisions Made

Record only decisions that were clearly agreed.

5.1 Approved Decisions

• [Decision 1]

• [Decision 2]

• [Decision 3]

Example:

• The pilot will begin with SOAP note draft generation only.

• No patient-facing chatbot function will be included in the pilot.

• Physician review is mandatory for all outputs.

5.2 Deferred Decisions

These are decisions intentionally postponed.

• [Deferred Decision 1]

• [Deferred Decision 2]

Example:

• Whether to include evidence summarization in pilot phase 1

• Whether to involve more than one physician in week 1

5.3 Rejected Ideas

These are ideas discussed but not approved.

• [Rejected Idea 1]

• [Rejected Idea 2]

Example:

• Autonomous follow-up messaging

• Direct patient access to AI& in the pilot phase

---

6. Revisions Required

List all requested changes to the documents or concept.

6.1 Revisions to Concept / Positioning

• [Requested revision]

• [Requested revision]

6.2 Revisions to Workflow / Pilot

• [Requested revision]

• [Requested revision]

6.3 Revisions to Security / Privacy / Governance

• [Requested revision]

• [Requested revision]

6.4 Revisions to Language / Presentation

• [Requested revision]

• [Requested revision]

---

7. Open Questions

These are important questions that remain unanswered after the session.

• [Open Question 1]

• [Open Question 2]

• [Open Question 3]

Example:

• What patient data is truly necessary in the first pilot?

• Which specialty should be prioritized first?

• What clinic policy constraints must be reviewed before pilot use?

---

8. Risks or Concerns Raised

Capture concerns raised by doctors, team members, or reviewers.

• [Concern 1]

• [Concern 2]

• [Concern 3]

Example:

• Concern that the review process may still take too long

• Concern that generated drafts may become too generic

• Concern about confusion between documentation support and clinical recommendation

---

9. What Remains Unchanged

This section is important.

Record the parts that were explicitly accepted and do not currently require revision.

• [Accepted item 1]

• [Accepted item 2]

• [Accepted item 3]

Example:

• Physician remains the final decision-maker

• Pilot remains limited to non-autonomous use cases

• Audit logging remains a mandatory requirement

---

10. Outcome of the Session

Choose one:

• Proceed directly to next phase

• Revise documents, then re-review internally

• Revise documents, then repeat presentation/discussion

• Pause project pending further clarification

Short explanation: [Write why this outcome was chosen.]

---

11. Immediate Next Steps

If Proceeding

• [Next step 1]

• [Next step 2]

• [Next step 3]

Example:

• Finalize pilot use case

• Prepare technical architecture detail

• Begin initial UI/UX mock-up

If Revising

• [Revision step 1]

• [Revision step 2]

• [Revision step 3]

Example:

• Update product blueprint to narrow scope

• Clarify data handling boundaries

• Revise pilot metrics and review rules

---

12. Owners and Deadlines

Task	Owner	Deadline	Status
[Task]	[Name]	[Date]	[Open / In Progress / Done]
[Task]	[Name]	[Date]	[Open / In Progress / Done]
[Task]	[Name]	[Date]	[Open / In Progress / Done]

---

13. Final Note

This log is not a formal legal document.

It is a practical alignment tool to help the team preserve clarity, avoid false assumptions, and make sure the project moves forward based on visible agreement rather than vague memory.

That is the point.

---

P.S. Other documents related to this document:

• Document 1 – Presentation Narrative

• Document 2 – Strategic Notes and References

• Document 3 – Product Blueprint

• Document 4 – Pilot Protocol

• Document 5 – Discussion Log (this document)

---

P.S.S. Read this document freely for information and guidance. Do not redistribute or restate—no quotes, summaries, paraphrases, or derivatives—without prior written permission from Prof. NOTA. Sharing the link is allowed. So, share the link, not the text. Do not discuss or re-tell the contents in any form—written, spoken, or recorded—without prior written permission.

---